Final Friday (August 1, 2025), the US Bureau of Labor Statistics printed their newest – Employment Scenario Abstract – for July 2025. What adopted was considerably extraordinary. The info and the revisions to the earlier two months knowledge releases (which is commonplace observe) confirmed that the US labour market is in decline. It starkly runs counter to the official Trump narrative that the US is booming. Whereas we don’t have sufficient proof to actually set up causality – it’s doubtless (based mostly on theoretical conjecture) that the extremely risky coverage regime that Trump runs and his tariff flip flops is undermining the arrogance within the economic system. We’d like just a few extra months of knowledge but earlier than we may be positive. However the BLS outcomes definitely help the view that Trump’s financial insurance policies should not working to benefit the American public. The extraordinary factor was that Trump then sacked the BLS head and signalled an extra descent in direction of totalitarianism.
Payroll employment tendencies
The BLS famous that:
Complete nonfarm payroll employment modified little in July (+73,000) and has proven little change since April … The unemployment fee, at 4.2 %, additionally modified little in July. Employment continued to development up in well being care and in social help. Federal authorities continued to lose jobs.
There have been some disturbing indicators together with:
1. “Among the many unemployed, the variety of new entrants elevated by 275,000 in July to 985,000. New entrants are unemployed people who find themselves searching for their first job.”
2. “In July, the variety of long-term unemployed (these jobless for 27 weeks or extra) elevated by 179,000 to 1.8 million. The long-term unemployed accounted for twenty-four.9 % of all unemployed individuals.”
These tendencies signify a slowing economic system.
The primary graph reveals the month-to-month change in payroll employment (in hundreds, expressed as a 3-month shifting common to take out the month-to-month noise). The crimson strains are the annual averages. Observations between March 2020 and March 2022 had been excluded as outliers.
The tendencies since 2022 has been constantly downwards.
The following graph reveals the identical knowledge differently – on this case the graph reveals the typical internet month-to-month change in payroll employment (precise) for the calendar years from 2005 to 2023.
The crimson marker on the column is the present month’s end result.
Common month-to-month change – 2019-2025 (000s)
| 12 months | Common Month-to-month Employment Change (000s) |
| 2019 | 166 |
| 2020 | -771 |
| 2021 | 603 |
| 2022 | 380 |
| 2023 | 216 |
| 2024 | 168 |
| 2025 (up to now) | 85 |
The info is clearly recording a constant downward development.
The controversy
Nationwide Statistical Places of work (NSOs) have confronted main difficulties because the Covid pandemic started.
First, when the outbreak first grew to become apparent, the NSOs had been compelled to desert face-to-face interviews and workplace workers had been required to work at home.
Many workers reported throughout many countries that they didn’t have the technological capability at their properties of a top quality that they used of their day by day work in the primary workplace.
The World Financial institution reported on August 11, 2021 – Nationwide statistical places of work nonetheless face disruptions and challenges as they adapt to a “new regular” – that they had been, in partnership with the United Nations launching a “international on-line survey … to observe the consequences of the pandemic on nationwide statistical operations world wide”
Of their last report – One 12 months Into the Pandemic : Monitoring the State of Statistical Operations Below COVID-19 – we realized of the “giant disparities within the means of nationwide statistical places of work in numerous international locations to proceed working”.
Many NSOs had their authorities funding lowered, as a consequence of the same old fiscal fictions that my professions pushes out.
Importantly, “Reaching migrants, internally displaced populations and individuals with disabilities throughout the pandemic is a problem for could statistical places of work, together with in high-income international locations”.
These issues had been heightened within the low- and lower-middle-income international locations, as one would anticipate.
Have these issues continued?
There’s proof that it’s now tougher for NSOs to run surveys.
A latest article within the Japan Occasions (June 17, 2025) – Confronted with dwindling response charges, pollsters flip to on-line surveys for knowledge – means that the normal face-to-face interviewing strategies deployed by NSOs continues to be a problem even 5 years into the pandemic.
Reliance on phone interviews has proved to be problematic.
For instance:
Solely 1 / 4 of Britons say they reply such calls, with most cautious of scams. Fewer than half of U.Okay. households have a landline, and people numbers may be troublesome to search out.
Consequently, within the UK, for instance, “Response charges have plunged” and:
By 2023, the info had grow to be so patchy, the ONS was compelled to droop its unemployment studying because it desperately sought to restore a key launch that helps inform authorities coverage, influences rates of interest and drives billions of {dollars} of funding choices.
That controversy led to the resignation of the chief statistician within the UK.
A number of issues have arisen that make it arduous for NSOs to conduct their knowledge gathering activies:
1. Individuals wont reply their cell phones if an odd quantity rings due to the rising incidence of scammers.
2. The rise of video surveillance on entrance doorways.
3. The rise in safe flats that make it inconceivable for surveyors to get to the entrance door.
NSOs have tried to beat these obstacles by shifting to on-line survey strategies.
This shift has launched new issues:
1. “biases within the knowledge, confusion over questions that a pc can not handle”.
2. “gaining belief amid a barrage of spam and fraud in individuals’s inboxes”.
3. “households could also be simply as more likely to ignore an electronic mail with a web based survey as a cellphone name”.
4. There’s a tendency for on-line respondents to “give excessive solutions on the internet” whereas they “would possibly suppose twice about giving any kind of excessive worth to an interviewer”.
There isn’t a easy reply.
Within the US, the identical issues have arisen:
… the speed for the Present Inhabitants Survey underpinning labor statistics has fallen by nearly 20 proportion factors in a decade to 68%. For the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey or JOLTS report, a enterprise survey, response charges have tumbled to nearly 30%.
The previous boss of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has mentioned that the normal Labour Drive survey from which employment and unemployment knowledge is gleaned “are dying, they’re decaying, they’re in very severe bother”.
If the pattern sizes fall under some stage, then the info turns into ineffective from a statistical perspective.
Noting all of the above, which is an ongoing downside, doesn’t in any manner counsel that the NSOs fabricate knowledge.
The US has different issues which might be Trump-made.
1. The “crackdown on immigration could also be discouraging foreign-born staff from taking part within the survey”.
2. Trump’s “job cuts throughout the federal workforce put higher strain on funding and staffing.”
There was a “catastrophic exodus of hundreds of staff from the US Division of Labor” as DOGE went about slashing departmental budgets and job slots (Supply).
I do know a number of individuals personally within the Division who’ve misplaced their jobs since February 2025.
The Division has misplaced about “20% of its workforce” already and that’s earlier than the foreshadowed ‘reorganization’ has been applied.
So, amidst all the problems I’ve summarised above, which have made the work of NSOs way more difficult, the US company accountable for labour knowledge assortment and dissemination is dealing with additional main job cuts that can, in response to insders, “trigger it to be completely dysfunctional”.
None of that is ‘unintended’.
This text from October 19, 1995 from the US Heritage Basis – The right way to Shut Down the Division of Labor – tells us that it has been on the Proper’s agenda for many years to eliminate the Division.
Don’t neglect that the Heritage Basis is the architect of Trump’s Venture 2025.
Proper-wing politicians and their boosters have lengthy been suscpicious of NSOs.
On August 15, 2022, the Australian Bureau of Statistics launched a brand new report – COVID-19 Mortality in Australia, Deaths registered to 31 January 2022 – which give the general public with verifiable knowledge and evaluation about how extreme the pandemic was on the time, notably by way of the way in which it was disproportionately impacting low-income households.
Proper-wing commentators went ballistic and claimed the info was false – denying that Covid killed individuals – and asserted that the info was being utilized by the federal government to justify the lockdowns.
The idea of – Epistemic democracy – has lengthy troubled the Proper.
The thought is that our so-called ‘democratic establishments’ have to have the ability to “talk, produce, and utilise data, interact in types of experimentation, combination judgements and clear up social issues.”
This is likely one of the justifications for adequately funding NSOs.
If the standard of the general public info is lowered or compromised then the capability of society to make good choices is lowered.
That has been the way in which that the Proper has sought to undermine governments that promote generalised well-being.
By selling huge disinformation campaigns they will undermine what John Rawls referred to as “imperfect procedural justice” and tilt the decision-making establishments in direction of advancing the particular pursuits of the Proper, which often coincide with the pursuits of Capital (the rich).
There are such a lot of areas of public debate the place misinformation dominates the knowledge that’s out there – local weather change, well being care, and so on.
In some instances, the officers cease publishing knowledge – in Australia, for instance, the conservative authorities sought to suppress labour market knowledge as a result of it was so dangerous.
Altering surveys to remove questions that produce ‘dangerous’ outcomes for politicians is widespread.
However what occurred on Friday is relatively extraordinary.
When the BLS launched the newest labour drive and payroll knowledge, it advised us that:
Revisions for Might and June had been bigger than regular. The change in complete nonfarm payroll employment for Might was revised down by 125,000, from +144,000 to +19,000, and the change for June was revised down by 133,000, from +147,000 to +14,000. With these revisions, employment in Might and June mixed is 258,000 decrease than beforehand reported. (Month-to-month revisions end result from extra reviews acquired from companies and authorities businesses because the final printed estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal components.)
The revisions are widespread in survey work like this as a result of the NSO has to honour an everyday temporal publishing calendar and for varied causes falls wanting getting all of the responses again in time.
Their answer – publish the partial outcomes after which revise them when the total knowledge is offered.
And the NSOs at all times sign that these partial outcomes are ‘preliminary’.
There are issues with this method – it will possibly mislead when the revisions are subsequently giant – however the various is to do what the UK ONS workplace did some time in the past once they suspended publication due to low response charges.
As famous above that heightened suspicions among the many Proper.
Anyway, common researchers who use NSO knowledge recurrently perceive the method of revision and should not alarmed by it.
However the US President clearly couldn’t sq. the newest BLS outcomes together with his ‘huge booming economic system’ narrative and as a substitute of admitting the loopy tariffs and different insurance policies that come and go each day weren’t serving to, he determined to disclaim the info and sack the boss of the BLS.
I recall after I was an undergraduate pupil who recurrently challenged the lecturers, I had an interchange concerning the veracity of one of many instructor’s claims concerning the labour market.
I quoted the precise knowledge that had simply been launched and the response I bought was that when the info the idea battle it’s the info which might be fallacious.
Holding these types of views are important necessities for the patterned behaviour of denial and social psychologists consult with as – Groupthink.
Trump definitely didn’t maintain again claiming that:
For my part, in the present day’s Jobs Numbers had been RIGGED as a way to make the Republicans, and ME, look dangerous.
His lackey Labor Secretary chimed in along with her help.
There’s an fascinating group within the US – The Pals of the Bureau of Labor Statistics – who recurrently defend the company and realise that it’s “important element of our nationwide knowledge infrastructure”.
On August 1, 2025, they launched a – Assertion on Commissioner McEntarfer’s Elimination – and famous that the President had engaged in a “baseless, damaging declare” concerning the BLS purely “responsible somebody for unwelcome financial information”.
Additional:
… The method of acquiring the numbers is decentralized by design to keep away from alternatives for interference. The BLS makes use of the identical confirmed, clear, dependable course of to supply estimates each month. Each month, BLS revises the prior two months’ employment estimates to replicate slower-arriving, more-accurate info.
Descent into totalitarianism
The US is now heading from authoritarianism in direction of totalitarianism.
We have now seen the way in which the science neighborhood has been consistently attacked by the Proper.
Authoritarian regimes often at all times search to discredit the science neighborhood.
Info are twisted to swimsuit the ideological ends.
The long-standing campaigns by tobacco corporations to disclaim the hyperlink between smoking and most cancers is an efficient instance.
Trump has demonstrated his willingness right here.
Bear in mind – Sharpiegate – when Trump’s crew falsified the trail of the official Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hurricane forecast for Dorian after which pressured the NOAA workers to retract their forecast.
Trump has additionally appointed various individuals into senior scientific positions that don’t have any background in any respect.
Then withdrawn analysis funding and scrapping scientific advisory committees which might be seen as an inconvenience (Supply).
Now Trump sacks the BLS head to position doubt in peoples’ minds concerning the high quality of the info.
For the reason that starting of this yr, the supply of US federal knowledge units has declined.
I’ve discovered that out from private expertise, notably in datasets within the well being space that I’ve used for years – now disappeared from entry.
The Federation of American Scientists famous that “focused, surgical elimination of knowledge units, or parts of knowledge units, that aren’t aligned with the administration’s priorities” (Supply).
A lot of the US knowledge protecting the ‘variety’ terrain has gone.
All of those tendencies are according to a shift in direction of totalitarianism.
That’s how such a shift begins.
Conclusion
The ‘land of the free’ is now a failed state and it’s scary that they’re nonetheless probably the most martial.
Having written this and different issues just lately, I don’t anticipate I’ll ever get a visa to enter the US whereas the present regime is in energy.
That’s sufficient for in the present day!
(c) Copyright 2025 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.