Court docket upholds CRA’s denial of taxpayer's incapacity credit score for sleep apnea



Court docket upholds CRA’s denial of taxpayer's incapacity credit score for sleep apnea

The

incapacity tax credit score

(DTC) is a non-refundable tax credit score that’s supposed to acknowledge the impression of varied non-itemizable disability-related prices. For 2025 the worth of the federal credit score is $1,521 however add the provincial tax financial savings and the mixed annual worth may be as much as $3,243, relying on the worth of the provincial credit score. Not each incapacity qualifies and there are particular standards relying on the kind of incapacity. The DTC can be a requirement to qualify for opening a

registered incapacity financial savings plan

(RDSP).

In a latest case determined earlier this month, a taxpayer who was affected by extreme obstructive sleep apnea tried to say the DTC for the 2014 to 2023 taxation years. To this finish, he accomplished the Canada Income Company’s required

Type T2201

, Incapacity Tax Credit score Certificates. The CRA subsequently reviewed the shape and issued a discover of willpower informing the taxpayer that he was not eligible. The taxpayer objected and finally appealed the CRA’s choice to the Tax Court docket.

The taxpayer is a small enterprise proprietor. Greater than a decade in the past his partner seen that she was not sleeping effectively as a result of she could be woke up every night time by her husband’s respiration. The taxpayer described waking up at night time, lurching, gasping and sweating. He was additionally falling asleep through the day, together with whereas in conferences at work or throughout dinner. The taxpayer finally sought medical consideration from his physician.

His physician suspected that he had sleep apnea and organized for a sleep examine with a respiratory providers agency involving an in a single day oximetry check. Based mostly on the outcomes of the check the physician recognized the taxpayer with obstructive sleep apnea and prescribed the usage of a steady constructive airway stress (CPAP) gadget, a heated humidifier and a nasal masks, to be worn on a nightly foundation, indefinitely.

The taxpayer bought a CPAP machine and began to make use of it at night time. In time, the taxpayer seen a major enchancment in his wellbeing and well being. His capability to perform returned with CPAP remedy and he was not waking up lurching and gasping and soaking in sweat.

The taxpayer sought to qualify for the DTC on the premise that his use of a CPAP gadget meets the eligibility standards for what’s known as “life-sustaining remedy.” Underneath the tax regulation, 5 situations have to be happy to be eligible for the DTC for life-sustaining remedy. First, the person should have a number of extreme and extended impairments in bodily or psychological features. Second, the person is receiving remedy that’s important to maintain a significant perform of the person. Third, the remedy is required to be administered at the very least two occasions every week for a complete period averaging not lower than 14 hours every week. Fourth, the remedy can’t moderately be anticipated to be of serious profit to individuals who should not have a extreme and extended impairment in bodily or psychological features. And fifth, the results of the impairment is such that with out the life-sustaining remedy the person’s capability to carry out a primary exercise of each day dwelling could be markedly restricted.

The CRA accepted that, on this case, the taxpayer met situations 1, 2, 4, and 5 nevertheless it was situation 3 that was problematic. That situation requires the remedy to be administered at the very least two occasions every week for a complete period averaging not lower than 14 hours weekly. Moreover, the Tax Act specifies that the time spent on administering remedy contains solely time spent on actions that require the person to take time away from “regular on a regular basis actions” with a purpose to obtain the remedy.

The taxpayer testified that, though he was in a position to go to sleep with the usage of the CPAP gadget, it was not so simple as placing the masks on and sleeping for eight hours. He described having to spend so much of time making an attempt to get to sleep with the CPAP masks. As well as, the masks would vent and the humidity would go away his face moist. When he rolled over through the night time, the taxpayer stated water would typically run throughout his face and wake him up, typically a number of occasions an evening. He would want to rise up to clean his face after which return to mattress, place the masks on and take time to fall again asleep.

The taxpayer accepted that sleep itself is a standard on a regular basis exercise and so the time he spent sleeping whereas utilizing the CPAP machine shouldn’t be included within the 14 hours. However he testified that the time he spent every night time organising the CPAP gadget, the time he spent making an attempt to go to sleep utilizing the CPAP gadget, the time spent being woke up by the CPAP gadget and the time spent making an attempt to get again to sleep after his sleep was disrupted totaled greater than 14 hours every week and needs to be thought-about “time away from regular on a regular basis actions.”

Whereas the choose was sympathetic to the impression that extreme sleep apnea has on the taxpayer and acknowledged the challenges that sleeping with a CPAP masks created for the taxpayer, he concluded that the usage of the CPAP gadget whereas falling asleep and whereas making an attempt to fall again asleep following a sleep disruption didn’t require the taxpayer to take time away from regular on a regular basis actions with a purpose to obtain the CPAP remedy.

In consequence, the choose concluded that the taxpayer didn’t obtain remedy that was required to be administered for a complete period averaging not lower than 14 hours every week as required by the tax regulation, and due to this fact situation 3 for eligibility was not happy. The taxpayer was due to this fact discovered to be ineligible for the DTC for the taxation years in query.

Jamie Golombek,
FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto.
Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com

.


In the event you preferred this story,
join extra
within the FP Investor publication.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *